New York Times, March 1:
More Than 80 Percent of Patient Groups Accept Drug Industry Funds, Study Showshttp://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/health/patient-groups-drug-industry-money.html
"Nearly 'nine out of every 10 are taking money,' said Dr. Ezekiel J. Emanuel, an oncologist and vice provost at the University of Pennsylvania. He is one of the authors of the study, which looked at the top 104 nonprofit patient advocacy groups that reported more than $7.5 million in annual revenues for 2014. 'I think that is not well known — I think that is a shock.'"
Comment: If we want to build social capital that can help get abusive healthcare prices under control, it's not enough to say that most patient advocacy groups are bad. I've been involved in patient advocacy for 3 decades, and it's very difficult to get other funding. People want to do advocacy, but for a serious commitment almost everyone needs at least a stipend to live on, and minimal computer etc. expenses. (Even the original Emanual article in the New England Journal of Medicine is behind a paywall - starting at $20 for 24-hour access, and you have to register just to see that price.)
Foundations are reluctant because they don't know the medical area, many won't consider individuals or new organizations, and most require 501(c)3 status, which doesn't allow much advocacy. Governments cannot help advocacy, of course. Individual donors will need to step up and help create new organizations to handle this.
Note: ACT UP Philadelphia is an all-volunteers organization that does not accept any drug company funding. Funding is difficult, but possible because this organization has been active for 30 years. We cannot build a whole movement that way.